As I mention elsewhere, the Dead Sea Scrolls are Jewish literature.  There is not a single mention of Jesus.  The Dead Sea Scrolls do not include any “gospels,” so they can hardly include gospels suppressed by Constantine or gospels that speak of  Christ in human terms. Brown also gets it quite wrong with respect to the Nag Hammadi library.  These are mostly or entirely Gnostic gospels, and the Gnostics hardly emphasized Jesus’ human side as compared to his divine side.  In fact, the Gnostics generally thought that Jesus was entirely divine, and not at all human.  The main reason Gnostics were seen as heretics by the orthodox Church and its leaders is not at all that the Gnostics over-emphasized Jesus’ humanity, but that they over-emphasized his divinity, to the exclusion of his humanity.  The Gnostics claimed that Jesus only “seemed” to have a body, that he could not feel pain, and that he could not really die.  His humanity was a mere appearance, his body a phantasm.  Brown and his allies can only claim that the Nag Hammadi library supports their conception of Jesus (and his “marriage” to Mary Magdalene) by misreading a tiny few of the thousands of lines of text in this set of documents.